INTEGRATIONS & PROVIDERS

Payment provider integrations: rails as configuration, not rebuilds

Every provider your platform touches, payment rails, card issuers, exchange venues, verification, sits behind one integration layer. New geographies and rails are commercial decisions with a defined onboarding path, and the layer works in both directions: the platform consumes providers, and exposes its own rails to your partners.

One layer between the core and every provider

The core never talks to a provider directly, it talks to the layer, and the layer talks to whoever is configured on the other side. That indirection is the whole strategy: payment rails for money movement, card issuers for issuing, an institutional exchange venue for crypto execution, and the specialist verification provider for KYC/KYB, each replaceable, none load-bearing for the product itself.

Per-rail behaviour as configuration

Integration is not binary, it is tuned. For each rail, whether payments process automatically or route to back-office approval is configuration, set to match your risk policy and the rail’s nature. Several providers of a type can run in parallel, card issuers do exactly that, each with its own currencies, account structures and per-tenant settings, so a brand launches with the provider that fits its market and switches without touching the product.

API access and webhooks, in both directions

The same infrastructure that consumes providers exposes the platform’s rails outward: API access with per-partner credentials, token and key management, IP restriction, and inbound and outbound webhooks for event delivery. Your partners integrate with your platform the way your platform integrates with providers, controlled, credentialed, observable.

That outbound direction is the foundation for serving third-party platforms and merchants as a payment gateway: the infrastructure is in place; the merchant-facing layer, checkout and collection flows, settlement cycles, dispute handling, is scoped per engagement.

New rails and geographies on a defined path

When your growth map says enter market X, the platform’s answer is a procedure: the new local or regional payment type is onboarded as a provider integration plus configuration, with a defined onboarding path, a commercial decision with a scope, not core development with a roadmap. The domestic rails running today arrived exactly this way.

Integrations and providers FAQ

Which provider types does the layer cover?
Payment providers, card issuers, exchange venues and verification providers, the external counterparts of money movement, issuing, crypto execution and onboarding.
For each rail you decide whether payments process automatically or route to back-office approval, policy expressed as settings, adjustable without a release.
Through the defined onboarding path: provider integration plus configuration, scoped commercially. Bring the corridor to the demo and we will map it.
Yes, card issuing does this in production: multiple providers side by side, each with its own currencies and rules, assigned per brand. The same layer discipline applies across provider types.
Yes, API access with per-partner credentials, token and key management, IP restriction, and webhooks in both directions is live. Documentation and environment access for your partners are part of scoping.
The foundation is in place, the outbound API infrastructure above. The merchant-facing layer (checkout, collection, settlement cycles, disputes) is scoped per engagement: Payment Gateway.

Bring your provider list, and your wish list

The ones you have, the ones you want, the markets you are eyeing: we will map each onto the layer, live.

Book a Demo  ·  How the platform works.